Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:24:20. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex9_1_7G.CDL Box data file name is: ex9_1_7.DT1 Initial box: [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ The independent minimal complete set is empty. The subspace dimension for the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis is zero. The problem is convex. MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 1 Total number of sub-problems: 1 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 4.00019999999999959E-002 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 1 BEST_ESTIMATE: 29.350097656250348 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: F N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 1 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 6.66133814775094121E-016 EPSILON_PHI: 79.350097656251918 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 1 [ 0.00 , 2.51 ], [ 0.00 , 2.26 ] [ 0.00 , 2.26 ], [ 0.00 , 1.82 ] [ 0.00 , 3.34 ], [ 0.00 , 3.34 ] [ 0.00 , 5.02 ], [ 0.00 , 4.53 ] [ 0.00 , 2.34 ], [ 0.00 , 1.86 ] [ 0.00 , 3.34 ], [ 0.00 , 10.0 ] [ 0.00 , 9.50 ], [ 0.00 , 10.0 ] [ 0.00 , 10.0 ], [ 0.00 , 10.0 ] [ 0.00 , 10.0 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] LP solution: 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.50 , 1.50 , 1.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.50 , 1.50 , 1.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.00 , 1.00 , 2.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 0.100 , 0.100 , 0.200 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.50 , 1.50 , 1.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.50 , 1.50 , 1.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 1.00 , 1.00 , 2.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 0.100 , 0.100 , 0.200 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -50.0 , 29.4 ] Equality constraint bounds over the box: [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , 0.00 ], [ -10.0 , 0.00 ] [ -2.56 , 0.223-307 ], [ -2.34 , 0.223-307 ] [ -2.34 , 0.00 ], [ -1.86 , 0.00 ] [ -3.34 , 0.00 ], [ -3.34 , 0.223-307 ] [ -5.02 , 0.223-307 ], [ -4.53 , 0.223-307 ] [ -2.34 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.86 , 0.223-307 ] [ -3.34 , 0.223-307 ], [ -10.0 , 0.223-307 ] [ -9.50 , 0.223-307 ], [ -10.0 , 0.223-307 ] [ -10.0 , 0.223-307 ], [ -10.0 , 0.223-307 ] [ -10.0 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ] [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 1 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows: 14 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 3573 Total number of forward_substitutions: 5 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system: 5 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 12 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 250 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component evaluations: 2300 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 14950 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.400E-02 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 3