Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:24:20. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex9_1_6G.CDL Box data file name is: ex9_1_6.DT1 Initial box: [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E+05 ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ The independent minimal complete set is empty. The subspace dimension for the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis is zero. The problem is convex. MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 1 Total number of sub-problems: 1 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 4.40029999999999935E-002 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 1 BEST_ESTIMATE: -51.999999754999941 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 0 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 1.26213814510833842E-006 EPSILON_PHI: 2.45000443044318725E-007 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 1 [ 10.0 , 10.0 ], [ 14.0 , 14.0 ] [ 28.0 , 28.0 ], [ 24.0 , 24.0 ] [ 15.0 , 15.0 ], [ 0.00 , 0.100E-05 ] [ 0.00 , 0.100E-05 ], [ 14.0 , 14.0 ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 200. ], [ 0.00 , 200. ] [ 0.00 , 0.930 ], [ 0.00 , 0.940 ] [ 0.00 , 0.963 ], [ 0.00 , 1.00 ] [ 0.00 , 1.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.965 ] LP solution: 10.0 , 14.0 , 28.0 , 24.0 , 15.0 , 0.00 0.00 , 14.0 , 1.50 , 0.00 , 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 , 0.375E-02, 0.00 , 0.00 , 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: 10.0 , 14.0 , 28.0 , 24.0 , 15.0 , 0.00 0.00 , 14.0 , 20.2 , 20.9 , 22.7 , 31.2 31.2 , 22.7 , 0.348 , 0.340 , 0.346 , 0.357 0.357 , 0.347 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -52.0 , -52.0 ] Equality constraint bounds over the box: [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -372. , 0.00 ], [ -376. , 0.00 ] [ -385. , 0.00 ], [ -400. , 0.00 ] [ -400. , 0.00 ], [ -386. , 0.00 ] [ -372. , 0.00 ], [ -376. , 0.00 ] [ -385. , 0.00 ], [ -400. , 0.00 ] [ -400. , 0.00 ], [ -386. , 0.00 ] [ -10.0 , -10.0 ], [ -14.0 , -14.0 ] [ -28.0 , -28.0 ], [ -172. , -172. ] [ -24.0 , -24.0 ], [ -176. , -176. ] [ -15.0 , -15.0 ], [ -185. , -185. ] [ -0.100E-05, 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , -200. ] [ -0.100E-05, 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , -200. ] [ -14.0 , -14.0 ], [ -186. , -186. ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -200. , 0.223-307 ], [ -200. , 0.171E-12 ] [ -0.930 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , -0.696E-01 ] [ -0.940 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , -0.596E-01 ] [ -0.963 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , -0.372E-01 ] [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ] [ -1.00 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ] [ -0.965 , 0.223-307 ], [ -1.00 , -0.347E-01 ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 1 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows: 9 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 7897 Total number of forward_substitutions: 6 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system: 9 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 13 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 285 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component evaluations: 2280 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 15960 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.400E-02 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 3