Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:24:34. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex8_4_1G.CDL Box data file name is: ex8_4_1.DT1 Initial box: [ -0.500 , 0.500 ], [ 0.400 , 1.40 ] [ 1.30 , 2.30 ], [ 2.10 , 3.10 ] [ 2.80 , 3.80 ], [ 3.90 , 4.90 ] [ 4.70 , 5.70 ], [ 5.60 , 6.60 ] [ 6.00 , 7.00 ], [ 6.90 , 7.90 ] [ -2.00 , 2.00 ], [ 5.40 , 6.40 ] [ 4.90 , 5.90 ], [ 3.90 , 4.90 ] [ 4.10 , 5.10 ], [ 3.00 , 4.00 ] [ 3.20 , 4.20 ], [ 2.30 , 3.30 ] [ 2.30 , 3.30 ], [ 1.90 , 2.90 ] [ 1.00 , 2.00 ], [ 0.00 , 10.0 ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ Independent minimal complete set indices: 81 85 89 93 97 101 105 109 113 117 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis: 11 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 Total number of sub-problems: 20 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 11 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 7.60049999999999892E-002 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 BEST_ESTIMATE: 0.61857287409911321 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 1 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 9.53594385677548036E-008 EPSILON_PHI: 0.19131587377829140 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 8 [ -0.500 , 0.500 ], [ 0.400 , 1.40 ] [ 1.30 , 2.30 ], [ 2.10 , 3.10 ] [ 2.80 , 3.80 ], [ 3.90 , 4.90 ] [ 4.70 , 5.70 ], [ 5.60 , 6.60 ] [ 6.00 , 7.00 ], [ 6.90 , 7.90 ] [ -0.600 , -0.400 ], [ 5.40 , 6.40 ] [ 4.90 , 5.90 ], [ 3.90 , 4.90 ] [ 4.10 , 5.10 ], [ 3.00 , 4.00 ] [ 3.20 , 4.20 ], [ 2.30 , 3.30 ] [ 2.30 , 3.30 ], [ 1.90 , 2.90 ] [ 1.00 , 2.00 ], [ 5.10 , 6.28 ] LP solution: -0.115 , 0.833 , 1.92 , 2.48 , 3.42 , 4.28 5.23 , 5.98 , 6.47 , 7.51 , -0.523 , 5.78 5.28 , 4.63 , 4.42 , 3.84 , 3.48 , 2.90 2.59 , 2.33 , 1.70 , 5.68 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: -0.488E-01, 0.855 , 1.97 , 2.50 , 3.50 , 4.27 5.26 , 5.96 , 6.43 , 7.50 , -0.546 , 5.81 5.32 , 4.71 , 4.42 , 3.87 , 3.46 , 2.91 2.53 , 2.28 , 1.69 , 5.78 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ 0.427 , 0.619 ] Equality constraint bounds over the box: [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -1.00 , 0.444E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.333E-15 ] [ -1.00 , 0.444E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.666E-15 ] [ -1.00 , 0.888E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.133E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.178E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.178E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.533E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.711E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.533E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.711E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.533E-14 ] [ -1.60 , -1.40 ], [ -2.60 , -2.40 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.533E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.355E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.178E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.178E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.266E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.178E-14 ], [ -1.00 , 0.133E-14 ] [ -1.00 , 0.888E-15 ], [ -1.00 , 0.133E-14 ] [ -6.28 , -5.10 ], [ -4.90 , -3.72 ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 2 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows: 20 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 2193 Total number of forward_substitutions: 9 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system: 11 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 19 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 398 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component evaluations: 880 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 24948 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.800E-02 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter: 0.400E-02 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 4 Number of times SUBSIT rejected a box: 18