Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on  05/08/2012  at  12:24:32.
 Version for the system is: March 13, 2009

 Codelist file name is: ex8_1_2_sourceG.CDL
 Box data file name is: ex8_1_2_source.DT1            


 Initial box:
[    0.00    ,    6.28     ]


 Printing in overall algorithm:           0
 Printing in LP:           0
 EPS_LP_FIT:  1.00000000000000002E-002

 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F
 USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F
 ------------------------------------------------



 Independent minimal complete set indices:
         28         24         18         14          9
          6

 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis:
          1
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 Total number of sub-problems:          20
 n_intermediate_bounds:           0
 working indices:
          1

 ------------------------------------------------


 ------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------

 Completion of run_solution_by_discretization.
 Total CPU time:  0.39202499999999996     
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 BEST_ESTIMATE:  -1.0708608549425251     
 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T
 N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED:           0
 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON:   0.0000000000000000     
 EPSILON_PHI:   1.5959413339805588     
 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F
 Solution boxes:
 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            1
 with overall box index:            3
[   0.808    ,   0.942     ]

 LP solution:
  0.628    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
  0.942    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.11    ,  -0.724     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[  -0.942    ,  -0.808     ], [   -5.48    ,   -5.34     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            2
 with overall box index:            4
[   0.942    ,    1.26     ]

 LP solution:
  0.942    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   1.05    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.39    ,  -0.797     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -1.26    ,  -0.942     ], [   -5.34    ,   -5.03     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            3
 with overall box index:            5
[    1.26    ,    1.26     ]

 LP solution:
   1.26    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   1.26    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -1.86    ,  -0.562     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -1.26    ,   -1.26     ], [   -5.03    ,   -5.03     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            4
 with overall box index:            9
[    2.83    ,    2.83     ]

 LP solution:
   2.51    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.83    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -1.49    ,  -0.368     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -2.83    ,   -2.83     ], [   -3.46    ,   -3.46     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            5
 with overall box index:           10
[    2.85    ,    3.14     ]

 LP solution:
   2.83    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   3.14    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.42    ,   -1.05     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.14    ,   -2.85     ], [   -3.43    ,   -3.14     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            6
 with overall box index:           11
[    3.14    ,    3.46     ]

 LP solution:
   3.14    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   3.20    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.55    ,   -1.07     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.46    ,   -3.14     ], [   -3.14    ,   -2.83     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            7
 with overall box index:           12
[    3.46    ,    3.46     ]

 LP solution:
   3.46    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   3.46    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -1.93    ,  -0.763     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.46    ,   -3.46     ], [   -2.83    ,   -2.83     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            8
 with overall box index:           16
[    4.93    ,    5.03     ]

 LP solution:
   4.71    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   5.03    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.22    ,  -0.941     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -5.03    ,   -4.93     ], [   -1.36    ,   -1.26     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            9
 with overall box index:           17
[    5.03    ,    5.34     ]

 LP solution:
   5.03    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   5.17    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.55    ,   -1.04     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -5.34    ,   -5.03     ], [   -1.26    ,  -0.942     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:           10
 with overall box index:           18
[    5.34    ,    5.41     ]

 LP solution:
   5.34    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   5.34    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.17    ,  -0.890     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -5.41    ,   -5.34     ], [  -0.942    ,  -0.869     ]


 ------------------------------------------------

 No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list:           20
 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system:       128769
 Total number of forward_substitutions:           42
 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist:          227
 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations:          100
 Total number dense point constraint gradient component
       evaluations:          444
 Total time spent in subsit
       (constraint propagation):    0.236    
 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter:    0.100    
 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more 
       coordinate widths:           40