Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on  05/08/2012  at  12:25:07.
 Version for the system is: March 13, 2009

 Codelist file name is: ex8_1_1_sourceG.CDL
 Box data file name is: ex8_1_1_source.DT1            


 Initial box:
[   -1.00    ,    2.00     ], [   -1.00    ,    1.00     ]


 Printing in overall algorithm:           0
 Printing in LP:           0
 EPS_LP_FIT:  1.00000000000000002E-002

 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F
 USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F
 ------------------------------------------------



 Independent minimal complete set indices:
          8          5

 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis:
          1          2
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 Total number of sub-problems:         400
 n_intermediate_bounds:           0
 working indices:
          1          2

 ------------------------------------------------


 ------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------

 Completion of run_solution_by_discretization.
 Total CPU time:   4.9923120000000001     
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 BEST_ESTIMATE:  -2.0218067683721381     
 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T
 N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED:           0
 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON:  1.00000017155821313E-008
 EPSILON_PHI:  4.10668649591565751E-002
 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F
 Solution boxes:
 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            1
 with overall box index:          220
[    2.00    ,    2.00     ], [   0.100    ,   0.100     ]

 LP solution:
   2.00    ,   0.555E-16

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.00    ,   0.100    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.04    ,   -2.02     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.00    ,   -3.00     ], [  -0.254E-05,   0.178E-14 ]
[   -1.10    ,   -1.10     ], [  -0.900    ,  -0.900     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            2
 with overall box index:          240
[    1.99    ,    2.00     ], [   0.101    ,   0.120     ]

 LP solution:
   2.00    ,   0.100    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.00    ,   0.106    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.06    ,   -2.02     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.00    ,   -2.99     ], [  -0.828E-02,   0.178E-14 ]
[   -1.12    ,   -1.10     ], [  -0.899    ,  -0.879     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            3
 with overall box index:          260
[    2.00    ,    2.00     ], [   0.200    ,   0.200     ]

 LP solution:
   2.00    ,   0.200    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.00    ,   0.200    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -2.05    ,   -2.01     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -3.00    ,   -3.00     ], [  -0.433E-07,   0.178E-14 ]
[   -1.20    ,   -1.20     ], [  -0.800    ,  -0.800     ]


 ------------------------------------------------

 No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list:          400
 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows:           34
 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system:        61622
 Total number of forward_substitutions:          868
 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system:           34
 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist:         4099
 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations:         3476
 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component
       evaluations:          520
 Total number dense point constraint gradient component
       evaluations:        35440
 Total time spent in subsit
       (constraint propagation):    0.760E-01
 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter:    0.400E-02
 FUNCTION_EVALUATION_TIME (in forward_substitution):   0.160E-01
 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more 
       coordinate widths:          406