Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on  05/08/2012  at  12:25:25.
 Version for the system is: March 13, 2009

 Codelist file name is: ex7_3_2G.CDL
 Box data file name is: ex7_3_2.DT1                   


 Initial box:
[  -0.100E+05,   0.100E+05 ], [  -0.100E+05,   0.100E+05 ]
[  -0.100E+05,   0.100E+05 ], [  -0.100E+05,   0.100E+05 ]


 Printing in overall algorithm:           0
 Printing in LP:           0
 EPS_LP_FIT:  1.00000000000000002E-002

 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F
 USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F
 ------------------------------------------------



 Independent minimal complete set indices:
          8          7          5

 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis:
          1          2
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 Total number of sub-problems:         400
 n_intermediate_bounds:           0
 working indices:
          1          2

 ------------------------------------------------


 ------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------

 Completion of run_solution_by_discretization.
 Total CPU time:   1.7641099999999998     
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 BEST_ESTIMATE:   5.6000000279999878     
 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T
 N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED:           1
 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON:  1.20000047676427390E-008
 EPSILON_PHI:   10000.000000000000     
 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F
 Solution boxes:
 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            1
 with overall box index:          210
[  -0.700E-08,    0.00     ], [   0.380    ,    2.62     ]
[  -0.115E-30,    1.92     ], [    5.60    ,    5.60     ]

 LP solution:
  0.159E-11,   0.380    ,  -0.320    ,    5.60    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   0.00    ,    1.62    ,   0.595    ,    5.60    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[    5.60    ,    5.60     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -90.5    ,    0.00     ], [  -0.700E-08,    0.00     ]
[   -2.80    ,   -2.80     ], [   -2.24    ,    0.00     ]
[   -2.24    ,    0.00     ], [   -2.24    ,  -0.320     ]
[   -1.92    ,    0.00     ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            2
 with overall box index:          211
[    0.00    ,   0.100E+04 ], [    0.00    ,   0.100E+04 ]
[  -0.200E+04,   0.200E+04 ], [   0.917E-12,   0.100E+05 ]

 LP solution:
   1.40    ,    1.50    ,   0.800    ,   0.236E-10

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   1.40    ,    1.50    ,   0.800    ,   0.236E-10

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   0.917E-12,   0.100E+05 ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[  -0.200E+16,    0.00     ], [  -0.350E+04,    0.00     ]
[  -0.250E+04,    0.00     ], [  -0.300E+04,    0.00     ]
[  -0.200E+04,    0.00     ], [  -0.400E+04,    0.00     ]
[  -0.400E+04,    0.00     ]


 ------------------------------------------------

 No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list:           18
 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows:           17
 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system:        12227
 Total number of forward_substitutions:           71
 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system:           17
 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist:         1087
 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations:          504
 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component
       evaluations:          952
 Total number dense point constraint gradient component
       evaluations:        25256
 Total time spent in subsit
       (constraint propagation):    0.760E-01
 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter:    0.960E-01
 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more 
       coordinate widths:           21
 Number of times SUBSIT rejected a box:          382