Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:25:06. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex5_2_2_case2_sourceG.CDL Box data file name is: ex5_2_2_case2_source.DT1 Initial box: [ -0.100E-03, 600. ], [ -0.100E-03, 200. ] [ -0.100E+05, 500. ], [ -0.100E+05, 500. ] [ -0.100E+05, 500. ], [ -0.100E+05, 500. ] [ -0.100E+05, 500. ], [ -0.100E+05, 500. ] [ -0.100E+05, 500. ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ Independent minimal complete set indices: 31 30 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis: 8 9 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 Total number of sub-problems: 400 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 8 9 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 3.60029999999999933E-002 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 BEST_ESTIMATE: 17500.397400000031 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: F N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 1 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 1.00000000004456541E-002 EPSILON_PHI: 18700.397400000125 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 400 [ -0.445-307, 600. ], [ -0.445-307, 200. ] [ -0.223-307, 500. ], [ -0.223-307, 500. ] [ -0.223-307, 500. ], [ -0.223-307, 150. ] [ -0.223-307, 500. ], [ -0.223-307, 500. ] [ -0.223-307, 200. ] LP solution: 600. , 200. , 200. , -0.111E-11, 450. , 150. 1.20 , 150. , 50.0 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: 600. , 200. , 200. , -0.111E-11, 450. , 150. 1.20 , 150. , 50.0 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -0.120E+04, 0.175E+05 ] Equality constraint bounds over the box: [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] [ 0.00 , 0.00 ], [ 0.00 , 0.00 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -0.150E+04, 0.00 ], [ -300. , 0.00 ] [ -600. , 0.100E-03 ], [ -600. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -200. , 0.100E-03 ], [ -200. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -500. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -500. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -500. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -150. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , -350. ] [ -500. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -500. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , 0.100E-01 ] [ -200. , 0.00 ], [ -500. , -300. ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 1 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 1973 Total number of forward_substitutions: 3 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 22 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 72 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 4968 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.400E-02 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 3 Number of times SUBSIT rejected a box: 399