Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on  05/08/2012  at  12:24:30.
 Version for the system is: March 13, 2009

 Codelist file name is: ex4_1_9G.CDL
 Box data file name is: ex4_1_9.DT1                   


 Initial box:
[    0.00    ,    3.00     ], [    0.00    ,    4.00     ]


 Printing in overall algorithm:           0
 Printing in LP:           0
 EPS_LP_FIT:  1.00000000000000002E-002

 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F
 USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F
 ------------------------------------------------



 Independent minimal complete set indices:
          8          6

 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis:
          1
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 Total number of sub-problems:          20
 n_intermediate_bounds:           0
 working indices:
          1

 ------------------------------------------------


 ------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------

 Completion of run_solution_by_discretization.
 Total CPU time:  0.32001999999999997     
 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS:          20
 BEST_ESTIMATE:  -5.5080132540552071     
 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T
 N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED:          17
 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON:  1.43433550050531300E-005
 EPSILON_PHI:   4.0769174253921419     
 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F
 Solution boxes:
 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            1
 with overall box index:           16
[    2.25    ,    2.40     ], [    3.11    ,    3.92     ]

 LP solution:
   2.37    ,    3.80    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.33    ,    3.18    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -6.17    ,   -5.51     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -20.2    ,    0.00     ], [   -92.0    ,    0.00     ]
[   -2.40    ,   -2.25     ], [  -0.750    ,  -0.600     ]
[   -3.92    ,   -3.11     ], [  -0.892    ,  -0.761E-01 ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            2
 with overall box index:           17
[    2.40    ,    2.55     ], [    0.00    ,    4.00     ]

 LP solution:
   2.48    ,    4.00    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.48    ,    4.00    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -6.48    ,   -2.40     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -28.0    ,    0.00     ], [   -105.    ,    0.00     ]
[   -2.55    ,   -2.40     ], [  -0.600    ,  -0.450     ]
[   -4.00    ,   0.223-307 ], [   -4.00    ,   0.266E-14 ]

 ------------------------------------------------
 Solution box number:            3
 with overall box index:           18
[    2.55    ,    2.70     ], [    0.00    ,    3.34     ]

 LP solution:
   2.62    ,    3.27    

 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer:
   2.62    ,    3.27    

 Objective bounds over the solution box:
[   -5.89    ,   -2.55     ]
 Inequality constraint bounds over the box:
[   -34.0    ,    0.00     ], [   -115.    ,    0.00     ]
[   -2.70    ,   -2.55     ], [  -0.450    ,  -0.300     ]
[   -3.34    ,   0.223-307 ], [   -4.00    ,  -0.657     ]


 ------------------------------------------------

 No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list:           20
 Number of orig. system inverse midpoint preconditioner rows:           22
 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system:         3119
 Total number of forward_substitutions:           63
 Number of Gauss--Seidel steps on the dense system:           22
 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist:          235
 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations:          486
 Total number dense interval constraint gradient component
       evaluations:          420
 Total number dense point constraint gradient component
       evaluations:         2976
 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter:    0.400E-02
 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more 
       coordinate widths:           26