Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:24:31. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex4_1_2G.CDL Box data file name is: ex4_1_2.DT1 Initial box: [ 1.00 , 2.00 ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ Independent minimal complete set indices: 31 11 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis: 1 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 Total number of sub-problems: 20 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 1 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 0.63603999999999994 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 BEST_ESTIMATE: -663.50056829180323 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 0 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 0.0000000000000000 EPSILON_PHI: 59.284350743580731 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 2 [ 1.05 , 1.10 ] LP solution: 1.08 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: 1.09 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -701. , -664. ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -0.100 , -0.500E-01 ], [ -0.950 , -0.900 ] ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 2 with overall box index: 3 [ 1.10 , 1.15 ] LP solution: 1.11 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: 1.10 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -717. , -657. ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -0.150 , -0.100 ], [ -0.900 , -0.850 ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 20 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 39122 Total number of forward_substitutions: 42 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 258 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 84 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 430 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.440E-01 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter: 0.720E-01 FUNCTION_EVALUATION_TIME (in forward_substitution): 0.400E-02 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 24