Output from RUN_SOLUTION_BY_DISCRETIZATION on 05/08/2012 at 12:24:31. Version for the system is: March 13, 2009 Codelist file name is: ex4_1_1G.CDL Box data file name is: ex4_1_1.DT1 Initial box: [ -2.00 , 11.0 ] Printing in overall algorithm: 0 Printing in LP: 0 EPS_LP_FIT: 1.00000000000000002E-002 ALLOW_EPSILON_APPROXIMATE: F USES_INTERMEDIATE_VARIABLES: F ------------------------------------------------ Independent minimal complete set indices: 5 3 2 Subspace variables from the Kearfott / Hongthong 2005 analysis: 1 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 Total number of sub-problems: 20 n_intermediate_bounds: 0 working indices: 1 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Completion of run_solution_by_discretization. Total CPU time: 0.33602099999999996 MAX_SUBDIVISIONS: 20 BEST_ESTIMATE: -7.4873118926695472 FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED: T N_FEASIBILITY_VERIFICATION_FAILED: 0 EFFECTIVE_EPSILON: 0.0000000000000000 EPSILON_PHI: 39.331338287927423 LP_SOLUTION_FAILED: F Solution boxes: ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 1 with overall box index: 1 [ -1.82 , -1.35 ] LP solution: -1.35 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: -1.35 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -45.5 , -6.22 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -0.650 , -0.166 ], [ -12.8 , -12.3 ] ------------------------------------------------ Solution box number: 2 with overall box index: 2 [ -1.35 , -0.700 ] LP solution: -0.809 LP solution possibly adjusted with a point optimizer: -1.19 Objective bounds over the solution box: [ -18.2 , -7.49 ] Inequality constraint bounds over the box: [ -1.30 , -0.650 ], [ -12.4 , -11.7 ] ------------------------------------------------ No. dense interval residual evaluations -- gradient code list: 20 Number of solutions for a component in the expanded system: 2999 Total number of forward_substitutions: 42 Number point dense residual evaluations, gradient codelist: 210 Total number dense interval constraint evaluations: 84 Total number dense point constraint gradient component evaluations: 430 Total time spent in subsit (constraint propagation): 0.400E-02 Total time spent searching for "D" in the LP filter: 0.640E-01 Number of times SUBSIT decreased one or more coordinate widths: 24